Google hates Flash as much as I do, or why loft websites suck
Recently I’ve been looking at the websites of a loft developments around Toronto. Without exception the sites suck in far too many ways. I’m going to pick on www.westsidelofts.ca, but it is by no means alone in its sins.
I’m not going to just complain, I’m going to provide some constructive criticism.
Here are points number 1, 2, and 3 on my list of how to not break your website don’t use Flash . Now I’m going to backpedal a little, and say that there are times when Flash can be a useful tool. However, creating a simple image and text based website is not one of those times, that’s what HTML is for.
OK, so that’s my ugly anti-Flash zealotry laid out. But why, what’s my problem? Well here one important problem:
Google hates Flash as much as I do - you simply can’t afford to have your site ignored by Google, but by using Flash that’s exactly what you’re going to get. Long story short, the text in a Flash based site is not readable by computers, so Google has no way of telling what your site is about, which means you don’t exist.
Here’s an example if you search for “west side lofts” on Google you should see www.westsidelofts.ca at number one, so far so good, and that’s because the URL contains exactly those search terms, so Google assumes the site must be relevant. But now try searching for lofts toronto, lofts toronto queen street or even west side lofts toronto and you won’t see the site come anywhere in the first several hundred results. That’s because they used flash to create the site so Google can’t read it to determine that it should be a top result for all those searches.
Now it would be possible to build a Flash site that didn’t have these problems to such an extent. But why bother, it makes much more sense to build the site in HTML, which could be equal or easily beat a Flash site in usability, attractiveness, findability and probably costs less to boot.

Comments (4)
Comment from Rothko:
[August 12, 2006]
I’m totally with you on this. The Google issue is definitely the biggest problem. But aside from that, there’s the sound issue. Most of the time, I have my PC connected to a pretty sizable keyboard amplifier and am listening to music on iTunes. And I normally regulate volume within iTunes itself, which means my computer’s volume is actually up to about mid-way (which just so you know is quite loud when directed through an amp.) Whenever I open one of these Flash sites and get blasted by some bass-thumping rhythm, I want to curse the developers out and ask them what makes them think I want to turn my home into a techno club while shopping for condos, or cars, or whatever else they’re selling. It’s just my opinion, but I feel sound should pretty much always be turned off by default. I’m sure there are exceptions to this, but there it is.
Trackback from Word from the Radiant Corps:
[August 13, 2006]
All Flash = Bad
We couldn’t agree more, although ‘hate’ is probably a little strong. There are lots of great uses for Flash, like animations and music playing, but building entire websites in it is a horrible idea.
Pingback from Why Flash is bad at seen:
[August 15, 2006]
[…] Now I don’t universally think that Flash is bad, and neither does the author of this article. But the point to take away is that an all-Flash site is generally not a good idea. In fact, even a mostly-Flash site is probably a bad idea if you want anybody to find you. […]
Comment from Craig Saila:
[November 3, 2006]
Heh. Seems someone may have been reading this post. Today, all of your example queries now feature and ad words buy for the development — and the the ad (titled “Toronto Lofts”) is generally the most prominent one.